Showing posts with label Kenya Political Parties. Show all posts

Political Parties Disputes Resolution and Submission of Political Parties Nominees to IEBC


INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL AND BOUNDARIES COMMISSION (IEBC)

POLITICAL PARTIES DISPUTES RESOLUTION AND SUBMISSION OF POLITICAL PARTIES NOMINEES TO IEBC

Further to the General Elections Guidelines given in the Kenya Gazette Vol. CXIV- No. 132 of 28th December 2012, the Commission hereby gives direction on the matter.

Your attention is specifically drawn to Paragraph C of the said Notice that disputes relating to or arising from nomination shall be determined within seven days of the lodging of the dispute with the Commission.

The Commission hereby informs political parties and the public in general that all disputes arising from the party nominations must be lodged, heard and concluded through political parties disputes resolution mechanisms as provided in their respective party constitutions within a period of three days from 19th - 21st January 2013.

Any aggrieved contestant may lodge a complaint with the Commission on the 22nd January 2013 latest 5 p.m. by filling the prescribed form provided for in the Gazetted Elections Rules and Procedures.

Prior to lodging the complaint, the contestant/party must have exhausted all Political Party internal disputes resolution mechanisms as provided in the respective political parties Constitutions and the nomination rules. 

The Commission will adjudicate and determine on all such disputes by 25th January 2013.

All political parties must submit their final list of the nominees to the Chairperson of the Commission at IEBC Headquarters, 6th floor Anniversary Towers, Nairobi by 5 p.m. on 21st January 2013.

AHMED ISSACK HASSAN, EBS
CHAIRPERSON
INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL AND BOUNDARIES COMMISSION (IEBC)



Posted in , , | Leave a comment

Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) Communication from the Chairperson on Political Parties Nominations

The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) is mandated by the Constitution under Article 88(1) and 88 (4) to regulate, monitor and settle disputes arising from political party primaries. 


To meet and effect this mandate with regard to the forthcoming party elections, the Commission intends (or has):
  • Meet provincial/county Commissioners with their respective security committees to assess and obtain political and security situation within their jurisdictions.
  • Establish Regional Monitoring teams headed by IEBC Commissioners.
  • Establish monitoring teams at the constituency level that will be headed by Constituency Election Coordinators.
  • Develop a monitoring tool that has been shared by all political parties.
Political parties on their part are expected to abide with all statutory legal and administrative requirements stipulated under the constitution, Elections Act, Elections Regulations and Political Parties. 

These include:

a) Submitting their elections nomination rules to the Commission and RPP (Section 27 of Elections Act 2011, Clause 19 of the Second Schedule to Political Parties)

b) Constitute an Elections board and have the names approved by the relevant party body

c) Prepare the procedure and activities for the elections both branch and National

d) Update and maintain proper and accurate party membership register/s and list of delegates

e) Prepare and submit the requisite notices to all the relevant bodies including IEBC, Ministry of Education and the General public

f) Identify appropriate and secure venues for nominations, compile and share the list of polling stations with relevant security and administrative organs of state

g) Appoint the electoral officials including the returning officers and presiding officers and to publicize the same well in advance for the general public notification

h) Put in place the necessary logistics including acquisition of strategic materials such as ballot papers , boxes and non-strategic materials and ensure their timely distribution

i) Ensure that on nomination day all materials and officials are in place well in time and in adequate proportions or quantities

j) Conduct party nomination elections and announce results in a transparent, peaceful and credible manner

k) Provide avenues and structures for adequate and credible dispute resolution. The law demands that the parties must be complicit to this provision before submitting their list of nominees to the Commission and that the list of party nominees cannot be altered once submitted. The law states clearly the date by which such list must be submitted to the Commission, that is, 18th January, 2013.

l) Filing returns of the party nominees with IEBC as provided under section 13 of the Elections Act. The role of IEBC is to interpret the will of the people in contested elections. This cannot be achieved unless political parties observe democratic principles and respect the will of the people as they conduct their primaries.

The Commission is determined to strictly adhere to the rule of law and deliver free, fair and credible general elections and it shall ensure that to the extent possible, the party primaries are conducted in an environment and manner that meets basic demands of the relevant laws and democratic precepts.

Signed
AHMED ISSACK HASSAN, EBS
CHAIRPERSON, IEBC
Your Vote, Your Future



Posted in , | Leave a comment

CLARION Press Release on Democratic and Inclusive Nomination of Candidates for 4th March Elections

CLARION

CENTRE FOR LAW AND RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
 
PRESS RELEASE:
 
DEMOCRATIC AND INCLUSIVE NOMINATION OF CANDIDATES FOR 4TH MARCH ELECTIONS
 
Introduction
 
1. CLARION has been working with groups that are traditionally disadvantaged when it comes to participation in politics and leadership. These include women, youth, minority ethnic groups and persons with disabilities. Broadly, CLARION aims to ensure that these groups are given sufficient space to participate in the political process.
 
2. Over the last few months, CLARION has been implementing the Democratic and Participatory Political Parties Nominations (DEPNOM) Project. The aims of DEPNOM are: to influence democratic political party nominations; and to advocate for participation of marginalized groups in the nomination exercises of different political parties.
 
3. On 13th December 2012, CLARION held the Political Parties’ Nominations’ Rules Public Review Forum in which the rules of different political parties were discussed after an expert review. The aims of the Forum were to review nomination rules submitted by different political parties to the IEBC with a view of exposing gaps that may lead to undemocratic nominations and disadvantage aspirants particularly from minorities and marginalized groups and to encourage marginalized groups to participate actively in the nominations’ process.
 
4. CLARION singled out political party nominations as one of the processes that tend to undermine the participation of these groups in the political process. Many times, political party nominations are opaque affairs, which neither follow stipulated rules nor adhere to regulations. In the past, candidates have complained about corruption at the political party nomination stage, a fact that has tended to undermine the credibility of elections. The issuance of direct nominations to candidates who are favoured by the leadership of political parties has tended to augment the problem.
 
5. CLARION is also concerned with the fact that because of their opaqueness, party political nominations are usually accompanied with violence particularly at the constituency level. It is therefore possible to minimize the occurrence of violence if nominations are conducted openly and democratically. This could then contribute to free, fair, peaceful and credible elections.
 
6. In cases where there is violence at the nomination stage, women, youth, minority ethnic groups and persons with disabilities suffer most and fair badly in attempts to get nominated. Minimising violence at the nomination stage shall therefore have the effect of making it possible for these groups to participate fairly in the nomination process and ultimately to participate in the political process.
 
Conclusions of review of rules
 
After its review of the nomination rules of a number of political parties, CLARION reached the following conclusions:
 
1. Political parties’ nomination rules are not in the public domain and some are treated as classified information to debar people from accessing and subsequently critiquing the rules
 
2. Currently, the nomination rules are deposited with the Registrar of Political Parties. However, many who have attempted to access these rules have found it difficult to do so due to the negative attitude and lack of political education and understanding of some officials in that office. Civil society groups, including CLARION, have in the past called for that office to be filled substantially but those concerned, for reasons of political self-preservation, have not heeded the calls.
 
3. Nomination rules rarely infuse any affirmative action for women, youth, minority ethnic groups and persons with disabilities. This is contrary to the requirements of the Constitution. The Constitution calls for participation of Kenyans in their diverse groups in the affairs of political parties.
 
4. A number of political parties have attempted to come up with policies that favour marginalized groups. 

However, our conclusion is that the major parties and coalitions have failed to do so. This may therefore not improve the situation of the marginalized groups.

Resolutions/Recommendations
  • Every political party should be alive to the need to empower marginalized groups so as to enhance their participation in politics, leadership and therefore policy formulation.
  • Nomination rules for political parties must therefore reflect the need to empower these groups; this will enhance the achievement of the principles encapsulated in the Constitution, like the two-thirds gender principle.
  • The requirement of paying two sets of fees, that is, to both the individual political party and the IEBC should be reviewed forthwith to provide space to marginalized groups to participate in the political process.
  • The IEBC nomination fees are high for the minority and marginalized groups. A reduction of fees in favour of members of these groups would also enhance their participation in the political process.
  • It is important that all political parties make public their nomination rules. The practice of selling these documents has negative implications. It is not just aspirants who would like to use the rules; scholars, students of politics, journalists and commentators are some of the groups likely to use the rules.
  • The practice of giving direct nominations is undemocratic and corrupt. It also has potential to lead to violence in the nominations process. All political parties must shun this practice.
  • In the context of coalitions, our counsel is that individual parties nominate aspirants for the various positions at all levels. This will make it possible for aspirants who are popular but who may be locked out of nomination because of malpractices such as direct nominations to be able to contest. In the past we have seen popular candidates winning after being nominated by fringe parties.
  • We call upon minorities and marginalized groups to utilize all opportunities available to them to take part in the political process. It is important that all Kenyans shape their destiny of their country by fully participating in the political process.

Signed:
 
CLARION
Morris Odhiambo
FRIDAY, 11/01/2013
C/O CLARION
P.O. BOX 46991-00100, 
NAIROBI
 
Email: info@clarionkenya.org
 
Website: www.clarionkenya.org



Posted in , | Leave a comment

Welcome to the New Order Party of Kenya

New Order Party of Kenya strives to represent the aspirations of the Mwananchi. Over post independence history, the country has been governed and ruled by winner takes it all regimes. This culture has led to enormous in equalities amongst and within the communities. Increasingly this has resulted to underdevelopment, disharmony amongst and within communities, tribalism and its accompanying vices and grand corruption.

Fair and equitable distribution of resources and opportunities provides the only avenue to inculcate patriotism amongst Kenyans. This has a direct result of empowering the Kenyans from the grassroots upwards with the net result of each person claiming a stake in the country.

Lack of sacrifice in leadership has been a key characteristic of the previous and current leadership. As a result lack of patriotism has led to all Kenyans in the leadership refuse to participate in the baking of the national cake. The leadership has only succeeded positioning themselves in the eating of the cake. The monies collected are increasingly used in wages and pecks satisfaction rather than in the development. The resultant order hinders the rate of development due to lack of basic infrastructure and overall poor governance.

NOPE has resolved to be in tune with the strongest urgings of our people so as to ensure that we remain their champions - not only as a liberation movement but in the rebuilding of our land after long spell of opportunistic capitalist defilements.

NOPE shall be constantly reviewing the effectiveness of our structures at all levels so as to face the world with continuing vigour and success. All members must examine their actions to ensure that they fit into the pattern set by the institutions of the NOPE.

The strength of NOPE lies squarely on its members. Each has a monumental role to play. This constitution document defines the character and the overall nature of our organisation. NOPE members’ diverse and collective contribution shall define the success of NOPE, as we must move towards Kenya Vision 2030.


Chairman

Lawrence Kamau Macharia



Posted in , | Leave a comment